lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu,  8 Feb 2024 23:10:28 -0700
From: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	dan@...m.net,
	bagasdotme@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net,
	dsahern@...nel.org,
	edumazet@...gle.com,
	kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com,
	jikos@...nel.org
Cc: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 3/3] net: ipv6/addrconf: clamp preferred_lft to the minimum required

If the preferred lifetime was less than the minimum required lifetime,
ipv6_create_tempaddr would error out without creating any new address.
On my machine and network, this error happened immediately with the
preferred lifetime set to 5 seconds or less, after a few minutes with
the preferred lifetime set to 6 seconds, and not at all with the
preferred lifetime set to 7 seconds. During my investigation, I found a
Stack Exchange post from another person who seems to have had the same
problem: They stopped getting new addresses if they lowered the
preferred lifetime below 3 seconds, and they didn't really know why.

The preferred lifetime is a preference, not a hard requirement. The
kernel does not strictly forbid new connections on a deprecated address,
nor does it guarantee that the address will be disposed of the instant
its total valid lifetime expires. So rather than disable IPv6 privacy
extensions altogether if the minimum required lifetime swells above the
preferred lifetime, it is more in keeping with the user's intent to
increase the temporary address's lifetime to the minimum necessary for
the current network conditions.

With these fixes, setting the preferred lifetime to 5 or 6 seconds "just
works" because the extra fraction of a second is practically
unnoticeable. It's even possible to reduce the time before deprecation
to 1 or 2 seconds by setting /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/regen_min_advance
and /proc/sys/net/ipv6/conf/*/dad_transmits to 0. I realize that that is
a pretty niche use case, but I know at least one person who would gladly
sacrifice performance and convenience to be sure that they are getting
the maximum possible level of privacy.

Link: https://serverfault.com/a/1031168/310447
Signed-off-by: Alex Henrie <alexhenrie24@...il.com>
---
 net/ipv6/addrconf.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
index 0b78ffc101ef..8d3023e54822 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/addrconf.c
@@ -1347,6 +1347,7 @@ static int ipv6_create_tempaddr(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, bool block)
 	unsigned long regen_advance;
 	unsigned long now = jiffies;
 	s32 cnf_temp_preferred_lft;
+	u32 if_public_preferred_lft;
 	struct inet6_ifaddr *ift;
 	struct ifa6_config cfg;
 	long max_desync_factor;
@@ -1401,11 +1402,13 @@ static int ipv6_create_tempaddr(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, bool block)
 		}
 	}
 
+	if_public_preferred_lft = ifp->prefered_lft;
+
 	memset(&cfg, 0, sizeof(cfg));
 	cfg.valid_lft = min_t(__u32, ifp->valid_lft,
 			      idev->cnf.temp_valid_lft + age);
 	cfg.preferred_lft = cnf_temp_preferred_lft + age - idev->desync_factor;
-	cfg.preferred_lft = min_t(__u32, ifp->prefered_lft, cfg.preferred_lft);
+	cfg.preferred_lft = min_t(__u32, if_public_preferred_lft, cfg.preferred_lft);
 	cfg.preferred_lft = min_t(__u32, cfg.valid_lft, cfg.preferred_lft);
 
 	cfg.plen = ifp->prefix_len;
@@ -1414,19 +1417,41 @@ static int ipv6_create_tempaddr(struct inet6_ifaddr *ifp, bool block)
 
 	write_unlock_bh(&idev->lock);
 
-	/* A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred
-	 * Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units.  In particular,
-	 * an implementation must not create a temporary address with a zero
-	 * Preferred Lifetime.
+	/* From RFC 4941:
+	 *
+	 *     A temporary address is created only if this calculated Preferred
+	 *     Lifetime is greater than REGEN_ADVANCE time units.  In
+	 *     particular, an implementation must not create a temporary address
+	 *     with a zero Preferred Lifetime.
+	 *
+	 *     ...
+	 *
+	 *     When creating a temporary address, the lifetime values MUST be
+	 *     derived from the corresponding prefix as follows:
+	 *
+	 *     ...
+	 *
+	 *     *  Its Preferred Lifetime is the lower of the Preferred Lifetime
+	 *        of the public address or TEMP_PREFERRED_LIFETIME -
+	 *        DESYNC_FACTOR.
+	 *
+	 * To comply with the RFC's requirements, clamp the preferred lifetime
+	 * to a minimum of regen_advance, unless that would exceed valid_lft or
+	 * ifp->prefered_lft.
+	 *
 	 * Use age calculation as in addrconf_verify to avoid unnecessary
 	 * temporary addresses being generated.
 	 */
 	age = (now - tmp_tstamp + ADDRCONF_TIMER_FUZZ_MINUS) / HZ;
 	if (cfg.preferred_lft <= regen_advance + age) {
-		in6_ifa_put(ifp);
-		in6_dev_put(idev);
-		ret = -1;
-		goto out;
+		cfg.preferred_lft = regen_advance + age + 1;
+		if (cfg.preferred_lft > cfg.valid_lft ||
+		    cfg.preferred_lft > if_public_preferred_lft) {
+			in6_ifa_put(ifp);
+			in6_dev_put(idev);
+			ret = -1;
+			goto out;
+		}
 	}
 
 	cfg.ifa_flags = IFA_F_TEMPORARY;
-- 
2.43.0


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ