lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:37:00 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Mateusz Polchlopek <mateusz.polchlopek@...el.com>,
 intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, horms@...nel.org,
 przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com, Lukasz Czapnik <lukasz.czapnik@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-next v4 4/5] ice: Add
 tx_scheduling_layers devlink param

On Sun, 25 Feb 2024 08:18:00 +0100 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> >Do you recall any specific param that got rejected from mlx5?
> >Y'all were allowed to add the eq sizing params, which I think
> >is not going to be mlx5-only for long. Otherwise I only remember
> >cases where I'd try to push people to use the resource API, which
> >IMO is better for setting limits and delegating resources.  
> 
> I don't have anything solid in mind, I would have to look it up. But
> there is certainly quite big amount of uncertainties among my
> colleagues to jundge is some param would or would not be acceptable to
> you. That's why I believe it would save a lot of people time to write
> the policy down in details, with examples, etc. Could you please?

How about this? (BTW took me half an hour to write, just in case 
you're wondering)

diff --git a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst
index 4e01dc32bc08..f1eef6d065be 100644
--- a/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst
+++ b/Documentation/networking/devlink/devlink-params.rst
@@ -9,10 +9,12 @@ level device functionality. Since devlink can operate at the device-wide
 level, it can be used to provide configuration that may affect multiple
 ports on a single device.
 
-This document describes a number of generic parameters that are supported
-across multiple drivers. Each driver is also free to add their own
-parameters. Each driver must document the specific parameters they support,
-whether generic or not.
+There are two categories of devlink parameters - generic parameters
+and device-specific quirks. Generic devlink parameters are configuration
+knobs which don't fit into any larger API, but are supported across multiple
+drivers. This document describes a number of generic parameters.
+Each driver can also add its own parameters, which are documented in driver
+specific files.
 
 Configuration modes
 ===================
@@ -137,3 +139,32 @@ own name.
    * - ``event_eq_size``
      - u32
      - Control the size of asynchronous control events EQ.
+
+Adding new params
+=================
+
+Addition of new devlink params is carefully scrutinized upstream.
+More complete APIs (in devlink, ethtool, netdev etc.) are always preferred,
+devlink params should never be used in their place e.g. to allow easier
+delivery via out-of-tree modules, or to save development time.
+
+devlink parameters must always be thoroughly documented, both from technical
+perspective (to allow meaningful upstream review), and from user perspective
+(to allow users to make informed decisions).
+
+The requirements above should make it obvious that any "automatic" /
+"pass-through" registration of devlink parameters, based on strings
+read from the device, will not be accepted.
+
+There are two broad categories of devlink params which had been accepted
+in the past:
+
+ - device-specific configuration knobs, which cannot be inferred from
+   other device configuration. Note that the author is expected to study
+   other drivers to make sure that the configuration is in fact unique
+   to the implementation.
+
+ - configuration which must be set at device initialization time.
+   Allowing user to enable features at runtime is always preferable
+   but in reality most devices allow certain features to be enabled/disabled
+   only by changing configuration stored in NVM.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ