netdev - Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] ice: fix bug with suspend and rebuild

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2024 17:33:50 -0800
From: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
CC: <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "Robert
 Elliott" <elliott@....com>, Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "David
 S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
 Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Przemek Kitszel
	<przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Michal Swiatkowski
	<michal.swiatkowski@...ux.intel.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1] ice: fix bug with suspend and rebuild

On 3/6/2024 8:56 AM, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote:
>>> Fixes: b3e7b3a6ee92 ("ice: prevent NULL pointer deref during reload")
>>> Reported-by: Robert Elliott <elliott@....com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
>>
>> Well, that refactor of config path introduced lots of issues. Could
>> validation folks include a short list of tests they tried out against
>> tested patch?
> 
> Sorry, I got confused and now I saw the same thing Simon pointed out.

Thanks, NP! this thread is for v1, and v2 is already posted with the 
refactor just moving the CONFIG_FOO in patch 1, and then the real final 
version of the fix in v2 patch two which switches all the intel drivers 
over to the new macros.

> 
>>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c | 16 ++++++++--------
>>>   1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
>>> index 097bf8fd6bf0..0f5a92a6b1e6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_lib.c
>>> @@ -3238,7 +3238,7 @@ int ice_vsi_rebuild(struct ice_vsi *vsi, u32 vsi_flags)
>>>   {
>>>   	struct ice_vsi_cfg_params params = {};
>>>   	struct ice_coalesce_stored *coalesce;
> 
> struct ice_coalesce_stored *coalesce __free(kfree);

Yes, but not in a "fix" patch for -net. I figure this is more of a 
refactor kind of thing, so will not include it in this change.

> 
> ?
> 
> and drop explicit kfree()s altogether?
>