netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] virtio_net: Remove command data from control

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:29:22 -0400
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	jasowang@...hat.com, xuanzhuo@...ux.alibaba.com,
	virtualization@...ts.linux.dev, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
	jiri@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/4] virtio_net: Remove command data from
 control_buf

On Thu, Mar 28, 2024 at 01:35:16PM +0000, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 04:49:09PM -0500, Daniel Jurgens wrote:
> > Allocate memory for the data when it's used. Ideally the could be on the
> > stack, but we can't DMA stack memory. With this change only the header
> > and status memory are shared between commands, which will allow using a
> > tighter lock than RTNL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...dia.com>
> 
> ...
> 
> > @@ -3893,10 +3925,16 @@ static int virtnet_restore_up(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> >  
> >  static int virtnet_set_guest_offloads(struct virtnet_info *vi, u64 offloads)
> >  {
> > +	u64 *_offloads __free(kfree) = NULL;
> >  	struct scatterlist sg;
> > -	vi->ctrl->offloads = cpu_to_virtio64(vi->vdev, offloads);
> >  
> > -	sg_init_one(&sg, &vi->ctrl->offloads, sizeof(vi->ctrl->offloads));
> > +	_offloads = kzalloc(sizeof(*_offloads), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (!_offloads)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	*_offloads = cpu_to_virtio64(vi->vdev, offloads);
> 
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> There is a type mismatch between *_offloads and cpu_to_virtio64
> which is flagged by Sparse as follows:
> 
>  .../virtio_net.c:3978:20: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
>  .../virtio_net.c:3978:20:    expected unsigned long long [usertype]
>  .../virtio_net.c:3978:20:    got restricted __virtio64
> 
> I think this can be addressed by changing the type of *_offloads to
> __virtio64 *.


Yes pls, endian-ness is easier to get right 1st time than fix
afterwards.

> > +
> > +	sg_init_one(&sg, _offloads, sizeof(*_offloads));
> >  
> >  	if (!virtnet_send_command(vi, VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS,
> >  				  VIRTIO_NET_CTRL_GUEST_OFFLOADS_SET, &sg)) {
> > -- 
> > 2.42.0
> > 
> >