lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 21:33:15 +0000
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@...nel.org
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@...il.com, ncardwell@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] tcp: fix tcp_grow_skb() vs tstamps

Hello:

This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>:

On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 19:34:50 +0000 you wrote:
> I forgot to call tcp_skb_collapse_tstamp() in the
> case we consume the second skb in write queue.
> 
> Neal suggested to create a common helper used by tcp_mtu_probe()
> and tcp_grow_skb().
> 
> Fixes: 8ee602c63520 ("tcp: try to send bigger TSO packets")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [net-next] tcp: fix tcp_grow_skb() vs tstamps
    https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/1bede0a12d3a

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ