lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 09:50:07 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
 Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
 Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
 Luiz Augusto von Dentz <luiz.dentz@...il.com>,
 Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: net: broadcom-bluetooth: Add CYW43439 DT
 binding

On 29/04/2024 22:44, Marek Vasut wrote:
> On 4/29/24 8:22 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/04/2024 17:10, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> On 3/19/24 6:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>> On 19/03/2024 05:20, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>>>> CYW43439 is a Wi-Fi + Bluetooth combo device from Infineon.
>>>>> The Bluetooth part is capable of Bluetooth 5.2 BR/EDR/LE .
>>>>> This chip is present e.g. on muRata 1YN module.
>>>>>
>>>>> Extend the binding with its DT compatible using fallback
>>>>> compatible string to "brcm,bcm4329-bt" which seems to be
>>>>> the oldest compatible device. This should also prevent the
>>>>> growth of compatible string tables in drivers. The existing
>>>>> block of compatible strings is retained.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>>
>>> Is there any action necessary from me to get this applied ?
>>
>> I recommend resending with proper PATCH prefix matching net-next
>> expectations.
> 
> I don't think bluetooth is net-next , it has its own ML and its own 

True, indeed. The net prefix confused me.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ