phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 07:03:08 +0000
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@....freebsd.dk>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net, Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
Subject: Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

In message <20140403070038.GD29196@...nwall.com>, Solar Designer writes:

>Can/should we require/ensure that all PHC submitters are subscribed to
>the discussions list?

Given how much email I personally get, any "mandatory subscription"
demands tends to piss me off a fair bit, so I'm very weary about
doing that to other people.

I think we should make it clear that discussions@ is where the
trouble starts, but leave it up to the submitters to decide if they
want to fence for their creation, or just let it float.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@...eBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.