phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:31:23 -0400
From: Daniel Franke <dfoxfranke@...il.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] submitters on discussions list

Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> writes:

> Agree with Dmitry. Ideally submitters should be on the ML, and that's
> their own responsibility to register and follow the PHC activity.

On a similar note, can we get a bot /join'ed to #phc that will log
discussion somewhere? I don't habitually hang out there, but it would be
nice to have a log that I could grep for mentions of EARWORM.