lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2014 13:17:36 +0100 From: Sascha Schmidt <sascha.schmidt@...-weimar.de> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] Another PHC candidates "mechanical" tests > But it is possible I did something wrong of course... Well after all it looks like a simple misunderstanding. Catena isn't supposed to be run with t_cost=lambda=0. In this case only 2*(garlic-min_garlic) calls to blake2b are made. This explains why there is no difference between BRG and DBG and why your patched Catena needs more memory. Not catching this kind of mistake is clearly our fault and we already uploaded a version with checks to our github repository. Sincerely Sascha Schmidt Catena Code Monkey