phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] RIG vs. scrypt performance comparison

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 04:20:13 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] RIG vs. scrypt performance comparison

On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 10:25:29PM +0300, Solar Designer wrote:
> Even at the mysterious "2400 MHz" (probably
> just a typo), this would be 2.2 to 2.5 seconds.  That's 6 times faster
> than the 12 seconds.

More like 5 times, sorry.  I make errors too.

> (And ~7.5 to ~8.5+ times faster if the CPU was
> also running at 3.9 GHz in the RIG benchmarks, which it might have been
> unless under-clocked.)

Alexander