lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 02:59:47 +1300 From: Peter Gutmann <pgut001@...auckland.ac.nz> To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net Subject: Re: [PHC] PHC output specifics Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@...il.com> writes: >Should the "standardization phase" be public (thus after selection and >announcing winners) or not (thus by panel members only, after selecting but >before announcing winners)? I don't think it needs to be public, I'm hoping none of it's that controversial since most of it is fairly straightforward (define an ID for OpenPGP, and OID for CMS/SMIME, etc), and in any case there's more than enough panel members to do a design-by-comittee if we need it :-). Peter.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists