phc-discussions - Re: [PHC] patents

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 17:40:46 +0300
From: Solar Designer <solar@...nwall.com>
To: discussions@...sword-hashing.net
Subject: Re: [PHC] patents

Bill,

On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 04:14:14PM -0700, Bill Cox wrote:
> I agree.  It is only the use with secret ROM that seems to be covered, and
> the 2006 patent covers this ground anyway.

It's good to know we're on the same page on this.

And yes, the existence of the older patent actually helps.  It means
less time left until expiration, at which point everyone can use secret
ROMs again.

Alexander