| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20030313122617.24F4240D5@sitemail.everyone.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2003 04:26:17 -0800 (PST)
From: Muhammad Faisal Rauf Danka <mfrd@...itudex.com>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Fwd: CERT Advisory CA-2003-08 Increased Activity Targeting
Windows Shares
*** There is an attachment in this mail. ***
_____________________________________________________________
---------------------------
[ATTITUDEX.COM]
http://www.attitudex.com/
---------------------------
_____________________________________________________________
Select your own custom email address for FREE! Get you@...rchoice.com w/No Ads, 6MB, POP & more! http://www.everyone.net/selectmail?campaign=tag
Received: from canaveral.indigo.cert.org (canaveral.indigo.cert.org [192.88.209.169])
by imta06.mta.everyone.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DBE1D1C31
for <mfrd@...itudex.com>; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 16:48:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (lnchuser@...alhost)
by canaveral.indigo.cert.org (8.11.6/8.11.6/1.14) with SMTP id h2BM3MK00985;
Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:03:22 -0500
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:03:22 -0500
Message-Id: <CA-2003-08.1@...t.org>
From: CERT Advisory <cert-advisory@...t.org>
To: cert-advisory@...t.org
Organization: CERT(R) Coordination Center - +1 412-268-7090
List-Help: <http://www.cert.org/>, <mailto:Majordomo@...t.org?body=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:Majordomo@...t.org?body=subscribe%20cert-advisory>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:Majordomo@...t.org?body=unsubscribe%20cert-advisory>
List-Post: NO (posting not allowed on this list)
List-Owner: <mailto:cert-advisory-owner@...t.org>
List-Archive: <http://www.cert.org/>
Subject: CERT Advisory CA-2003-08 Increased Activity Targeting Windows Shares
Precedence: bulk
Sender: cert-advisory-owner@...t.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
CERT Advisory CA-2003-08 Increased Activity Targeting Windows Shares
Original release date: March 11, 2003
Source: CERT/CC
A complete revision history can be found at the end of this file.
Systems Affected
* Microsoft Windows 2000
* Microsoft Windows XP
Overview
In recent weeks, the CERT/CC has observed an increase in the number of
reports of systems running Windows 2000 and XP compromised due to
poorly protected file shares.
I. Description
Over the past few weeks, the CERT/CC has received an increasing number
of reports of intruder activity involving the exploitation of Null
(i.e., non-existent) or weak Administrator passwords on Server Message
Block (SMB) file shares used on systems running Windows 2000 or
Windows XP. This activity has resulted in the successful compromise of
thousands of systems, with home broadband users' systems being a prime
target. Recent examples of such activity are the attack tools known as
W32/Deloder, GT-bot, sdbot, and W32/Slackor, which are described in
more detail below.
Background
Microsoft Windows uses the SMB protocol to share files and printer
resources with other computers. In older versions of Windows (e.g.,
95, 98, Me, and NT), SMB shares ran on NetBIOS over TCP/IP (NBT) on
ports 137/tcp and udp, 138/udp, and 139/tcp. However, in later
versions of Windows (e.g., 2000 and XP), it is possible to run SMB
directly over TCP/IP on port 445/tcp.
Windows file shares with poorly chosen or Null passwords have been a
recurring security risk for both corporate networks and home users for
some time:
* IN-2002-06: W32/Lioten Malicious Code
* CA-2001-20: Continuing Threats to Home Users
* IN-2000-02: Exploitation of Unprotected Windows Networking Shares
* IN-2000-03: 911 Worm
It has often been the case that these poorly configured shares were
exposed to the Internet. Intruders have been able to leverage poorly
protected Windows shares by exploiting weak or Null passwords to
access user-created and default administrative shares. This problem is
exacerbated by another relevant trend: intruders specifically
targeting Internet address ranges known to contain a high density of
weakly protected systems. As described in CA-2001-20, the intruders'
efforts commonly focus on addresses known to be used by home broadband
connections.
Recent developments
The CERT/CC has recently received a number of reports of exploitation
of Null or weak Administrator passwords on systems running Windows
2000 or Windows XP. Thousands of systems have been compromised in this
manner.
Although the tools involved in these reports vary, they exhibit a
number of common traits, including
* scanning for systems listening on 445/tcp (frequently within the
same /16 network as the infected host)
* exploiting Null or weak passwords to gain access to the
Administrator account
* opening backdoors for remote access
* connecting back to Internet Relay Chat (IRC) servers to await
additional commands from attackers
* installing or supporting tools for use in distributed
denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks
Some of the tools reported have self-propagating (i.e., worm)
capabilities, while others are propagated via social engineering
techniques similar to those described in IN-2002-03: Social
Engineering Attacks via IRC and Instant Messaging.
The network scanning associated with this activity is widespread but
appears to be especially concentrated in address ranges commonly
associated with home broadband users. Using these techniques, many
attackers have built sizable networks of DDoS agents, each comprised
of thousands of compromised systems.
W32/Deloder
The self-propagating W32/Deloder malicious code is an example of the
intruder activity described above. It begins by scanning the /16
(i.e., addresses with the same first two high-order octets) of the
infected host for systems listening on 445/tcp. When a connection is
established, W32/Deloder attempts to compromise the Administrator
account by using a list of pre-loaded passwords. Variants may include
different or additional passwords, but reports to the CERT/CC indicate
that the following have appeared thus far:
[NULL] 0 000000 00000000 007 1 110 111 111111 11111111 12
121212 123 123123 1234 12345 123456 1234567 12345678 123456789
1234qwer 123abc 123asd 123qwe 2002 2003 2600 54321 654321
88888888 Admin Internet Login Password a aaa abc abc123 abcd
admin admin123 administrator alpha asdf computer database
enable foobar god godblessyou home ihavenopass login love
mypass mypass123 mypc mypc123 oracle owner pass passwd password
pat patrick pc pw pw123 pwd qwer root secret server sex super
sybase temp temp123 test test123 win xp xxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx yxcv zxcv
On successful compromise of the Administrator account, W32/Deloder
copies itself to the victim, placing multiple copies in various
locations on the system. Additionally, it adds a registry key that
will cause the automatic execution of dvldr32.exe (one of the
aforementioned copies). The victim will begin scanning for other
systems to infect after it is restarted.
W32/Deloder opens up backdoors on the victim system to allow attackers
further access. It does this in two ways:
1. attempting to connect to one of a number of pre-configured IRC
servers
2. installing a copy of VNC (Virtual Network Computing), an
open-source remote display tool from AT&T, listening on 5800/tcp
or 5900/tcp
Note: VNC in and of itself is not a malicious tool, and has many other
legitimate uses.
During the course of infection by W32/Deloder, a number of files may
be created on the system. Reports indicate that files matching the
following descriptions have been found on compromised systems:
Filename
File Size (bytes)
Description
dvldr32.exe
745,984
The self-propagating malicious code
inst.exe
684,562
This file installs the backdoor applications onto the victim host
psexec.exe
36,352
A copy of the Remote Process Launch application (not inherently
malicious, but it is what allows the worm to replicate)
explorer.exe
212,992
A renamed copy of the VNC application
omnithread_rt.dll
57,344
VNC dependency file
VNCHooks.dll
32,768
VNC dependency file
rundll32.exe
29,336
The IRC-Pitchfork bot application
cygwin1.dll
944,968
IRC-Pitschfork dependency file
GT-bot and sdbot
Intruders frequently use IRC "bots" (automated software that accepts
commands via IRC channels) to remotely control compromised systems.
GT-bot and sdbot are two examples of intruder-developed IRC bots. Both
support automated scanning and exploitation of inadequately protected
Windows shares. These tools also offer intruders a variety of DDoS
capabilities, including the ability to generate ICMP, UDP, or TCP
traffic.
Tools like these are undergoing constant development in the intruder
community and are frequently included as part of other tools. As a
result, the names, sizes, and other characteristics of the files that
might contain these tools vary widely. Furthermore, once installed,
the tools are designed to hide themselves fairly well, so detection
may be difficult.
The CERT/CC has received reports of sdbot networks as large as 7,000
systems, and GT-bot networks in excess of 140,000 systems.
W32/Slackor
The W32/Slackor worm is another example of a tool that targets file
shares. On a compromised machine, the worm begins by scanning the /16
of the infected host for other systems listening on 445/tcp. When a
system is discovered, W32/Slackor connects to the $IPC share using a
set of pre-programmed usernames and passwords, copies itself to the
C:\sp directory, and runs its payload. The payload consists of the
following files:
Filename
Description
slacke-worm.exe
The self-propagating malicious code
abc.bat
List of usernames/passwords
psexec.exe
A copy of the Remote Process Launch application (from sysinternals.com,
used for replicating the worm)
main.exe
The bot application
W32/Slackor also contains an IRC bot. When this bot joins its IRC
network, a remote intruder controlling the IRC channel can issue
arbitrary commands on the compromised computer, including launching
denial-of-service attacks.
Network footprint
Widespread scanning for 445/tcp indicates activity of this type.
Compromised hosts may also have unauthorized connections to IRC
servers (typically on 6667/tcp, although ports may vary).
Additionally, the VNC package installed by W32/Deloder will typically
listen on 5800/tcp or 5900/tcp. If a compromised system is used in a
DDoS attack on another site, large volumes of IP traffic (ICMP, UDP,
or TCP) may be detected emanating from the compromised system.
II. Impact
The presence of any of these tools on a system indicates that the
Administrator password has likely been compromised, and the entire
system is therefore suspect. With this level of access, intruders may
* exercise remote control
* expose confidential data
* install other malicious software
* change files
* delete files
* launch attacks against other sites
The scanning activities of these tools may generate high volumes of
445/tcp traffic. As a result, some Internet-connected hosts or
networks with compromised hosts may experience performance issues
(including denial-of-service conditions).
Sites targeted by the DDoS agents installed by this activity may
experience unusually heavy traffic volumes or high packet rates,
resulting in degradation of services or loss of connectivity
altogether.
III. Solution
In addition to following the steps outlined in this section, the
CERT/CC encourages home users to review the "Home Network Security"
and "Home Computer Security" documents.
Disable or secure file shares
Best practice dictates a policy of least privilege; if a given
computer is not intended to be a server (i.e., share files with
others), "File and Printer Sharing for Microsoft Networks" should be
disabled.
For computers that export shares, ensure that user authentication is
required and that each account has a well-chosen password.
Furthermore, consider using a firewall to control which computer can
access these shares.
By default, Windows NT, 2000, and XP create certain hidden and
administrative shares. See the HOW TO: Create and Delete Hidden or
Administrative Shares on Client Computers for further guidelines on
managing these shares.
Use strong passwords
The various tools described above exploit the use of weak or Null
passwords in order to propagate, so using strong passwords can help
keep them from infecting your systems.
Microsoft has posted a "Create Strong Passwords" checklist.
Run and maintain an anti-virus product
The malicious code being distributed in these attacks is under
continuous development by intruders, but most anti-virus software
vendors release frequently updated information, tools, or virus
databases to help detect and recover from the malicious code involved
in this activity. Therefore, it is important that users keep their
anti-virus software up to date. The CERT/CC maintains a partial list
of anti-virus vendors.
Many anti-virus packages support automatic updates of virus
definitions. The CERT/CC recommends using these automatic updates when
available.
Do not run programs of unknown origin
Never download, install, or run a program unless you know it to be
authored by a person or company that you trust. Users of IRC, Instant
Messaging (IM), and file-sharing services should be particularly wary
of following links or running software sent to them by other users, as
this is a commonly used method among intruders attempting to build
networks of DDoS agents.
Deploy a firewall
The CERT/CC also recommends using a firewall product, such as a
network appliance or a personal firewall software package. In some
situations, these products may be able to alert users to the fact that
their machine has been compromised. Furthermore, they have the ability
to block intruders from accessing backdoors over the network. However,
no firewall can detect or stop all attacks, so it is important to
continue to follow safe computing practices.
Ingress/egress filtering
Ingress filtering manages the flow of traffic as it enters a network
under your administrative control. In the network usage policy of many
sites, external hosts are only permitted to initiate inbound traffic
to machines that provide public services on specific ports. Thus,
ingress filtering should be performed at the border to prohibit
externally initiated inbound traffic to non-authorized services.
Egress filtering manages the flow of traffic as it leaves a network
under your administrative control. There is typically limited need for
internal systems to access SMB shares across the Internet.
In the case of the intruder activity described above, blocking
connections to port 445/tcp from entering or leaving your network
reduces the risk of external infected systems attacking hosts inside
your network or vice-versa.
Recovering from a system compromise
If you believe a system under your administrative control has been
compromised, please follow the steps outlined in
Steps for Recovering from a UNIX or NT System Compromise
IV. References
1. Trends in Denial of Service Attack Technology:
http://www.cert.org/archive/pdf/DoS_trends.pdf
2. Managing the Threat of Denial-of-Service Attacks:
http://www.cert.org/archive/pdf/Managing_DoS.pdf
3. IN-2002-06: W32/Lioten Malicious Code:
http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2002-06.html
4. CA-2001-20: Continuing Threats to Home Users:
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2001-20.html
5. IN-2000-02: Exploitation of Unprotected Windows Networking Shares:
http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2000-02.html
6. IN-2000-03: 911 Worm:
http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2000-03.html
7. IN-2002-03: Social Engineering Attacks via IRC and Instant
Messaging: http://www.cert.org/incident_notes/IN-2002-03.html
8. VNC (Virtual Network Computing):
http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/
9. Home Network Security:
http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/home_networks.html
10. Home Computer Security:
http://www.cert.org/homeusers/HomeComputerSecurity/
11. HOW TO: Create and Delete Hidden or Administrative Shares on
Client Computers:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q314984&sd
=tech
12. Checklist: Create Strong Passwords:
http://www.microsoft.com/security/articles/password.asp
13. Anti-virus vendors:
http://www.cert.org/other_sources/viruses.html#VI
14. Steps for Recovering from a UNIX or NT System Compromise:
http://www.cert.org/tech_tips/win-UNIX-system_compromise.html
Reporting
The CERT/CC is interested in receiving reports of this activity. If
machines under your administrative control are compromised, please
send mail to cert@...t.org with the following text included in the
subject line: "[CERT#36888]".
_________________________________________________________________
Feedback can be directed to the authors: Allen Householder and Roman
Danyliw
______________________________________________________________________
This document is available from:
http://www.cert.org/advisories/CA-2003-08.html
______________________________________________________________________
CERT/CC Contact Information
Email: cert@...t.org
Phone: +1 412-268-7090 (24-hour hotline)
Fax: +1 412-268-6989
Postal address:
CERT Coordination Center
Software Engineering Institute
Carnegie Mellon University
Pittsburgh PA 15213-3890
U.S.A.
CERT/CC personnel answer the hotline 08:00-17:00 EST(GMT-5) /
EDT(GMT-4) Monday through Friday; they are on call for emergencies
during other hours, on U.S. holidays, and on weekends.
Using encryption
We strongly urge you to encrypt sensitive information sent by email.
Our public PGP key is available from
http://www.cert.org/CERT_PGP.key
If you prefer to use DES, please call the CERT hotline for more
information.
Getting security information
CERT publications and other security information are available from
our web site
http://www.cert.org/
To subscribe to the CERT mailing list for advisories and bulletins,
send email to majordomo@...t.org. Please include in the body of your
message
subscribe cert-advisory
* "CERT" and "CERT Coordination Center" are registered in the U.S.
Patent and Trademark Office.
______________________________________________________________________
NO WARRANTY
Any material furnished by Carnegie Mellon University and the Software
Engineering Institute is furnished on an "as is" basis. Carnegie
Mellon University makes no warranties of any kind, either expressed or
implied as to any matter including, but not limited to, warranty of
fitness for a particular purpose or merchantability, exclusivity or
results obtained from use of the material. Carnegie Mellon University
does not make any warranty of any kind with respect to freedom from
patent, trademark, or copyright infringement.
_________________________________________________________________
Conditions for use, disclaimers, and sponsorship information
Copyright 2003 Carnegie Mellon University.
Revision History
March 11, 2003: Initial release
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.8
iQCVAwUBPm5bd2jtSoHZUTs5AQGJkQQAskLQbGaPphIDbOdtvazUNJTuXroPQNyo
5Fw2RNeKkr3ECvmtuRRqDaDUyx1mziCDz8i655twWsY5k1Jexl+WICLlFvvf5jpA
bgJYskeEagBNAGlkvAZuI48tOtC/O3M01dTLzVmN083Tqn22ZXl/w5nHMVu4y81t
XqROPqun25M=
=hbFj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists