bugtraq - Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] Linux 2.4.x execve() file read race vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3EFCC547.4000103@immunix.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 15:29:27 -0700
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin@...unix.com>
To: NC Agent <NC_Agent@...ppers-familie.de>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Security] [vendor-sec] Linux 2.4.x execve() file read race	vulnerability

NC Agent wrote:

> Hi people,
>
> again it is time to discover a funny bug inside the Linux execve() 
> system call.
> ...
> Obviously the setuid binary has been duplicated :-) (but with no 
> setuid flag of course). 

You mean there are actually still people who believe that granting x 
permission but not r permission actually prevents people from reading 
the file? I mean besides the crowd that believes in Santa Clause, the 
Easter Bunny, and Jesus :) I expect there to be a large number of ways 
to do this. This particular hack is cute, though :)

Crispin, equal opportunity offender :)

-- 
Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.           http://immunix.com/~crispin/
Chief Scientist, Immunix       http://immunix.com
            http://www.immunix.com/shop/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html