lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:12:31 +0000
From: Uwe Ohse <uwe@...e.de>
To: qmail@...t.cr.yp.to, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: possible open relay hole in qmail-smtpd-auth patch


On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 04:48:18PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
 
> Actually, it is *quite* legal to reply a '250 OK' on something that 
> will eventually

the patch (qmail-1.03-jms1-antispam.patch) replies with 250, even though 
it already knows that the message will _not_ reach the recipient and 
will _not_ be bounced. It knows that the message is being sent to 
/dev/null.

Sorry for being unclear.

Regards, Uwe


Powered by blists - more mailing lists