bugtraq - RE: Buffer overflow prevention

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <A0E465D8EE21FE4EA9DB3C11F48EB1FB01FB0F66@europa.mesas.mis>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 17:31:49 -0500
From: "Avery Buffington" <avery.buffington@...n.com>
To: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: Buffer overflow prevention




no, he ment W^X ("W xor X") but I'm not about to go into a comparison of the two or their pros and cons. 

second bullet of http://www.openbsd.org/33.html#new will explain W^X but http://archives.neohapsis.com/archives/openbsd/2003-04/1678.html will make you chuckle


-----Original Message-----
From: noir [mailto:noir@....linux.org.tr]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 5:01 PM
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Buffer overflow prevention 



I believe that Mr. Raadt meant PAX by W^X. 
We all enjoy ascii art but I wanted to note that renaming somebody 
elses work is not so ethical.