bugtraq - Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.51.0309072145220.54030@helena.whitefang.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 21:46:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thamer Al-Harbash <tmh@...tefang.com>
To: 3APA3A <3APA3A@...URITY.NNOV.RU>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: 11 years of inetd default insecurity?

On Sat, 6 Sep 2003, 3APA3A wrote:

> Dear bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
>
> Well,  we all blame Microsoft in insecure default configuration... Isn't
> it time to clean outdated code in Unix?

This has been a known problem for quite a while. In fact
D. J. Bernstein already solved it with tcpserver:

http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp.html

If you look at the bottom he points out pretty much what you
pointed out.

-- 
Thamer Al-Harbash
GPG Key fingerprint: D7F3 1E3B F329 8DD5 FAE3  03B1 A663 E359 D686 AA1F
                    "HLAGHLHALUAG (KTHANX)"