lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ED6ECA49A4AAC345A771F97A3B5E66920129F9D9@hb_commserv.hendersonbrothers.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 17:21:26 -0400
From: "Connor, Ethan M. W" <emconnor@...dersonbrothers.com>
To: "'Ansgar Wiechers'" <bugtraq@...netcobalt.net>,
   Nicholas Weaver
	 <nweaver@...berkeley.edu>
Cc: Stefan Esser <s.esser@...atters.de>, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com,
   bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft


If I understand things correctly, the EULA is PART of the sales contract.
If you do not agree to the license agreement, than the purchase never was
legitimized, and therefore there is no sales contract - which by the way is
what entitles you to a complete refund if you desire it (since legally the
sale never happened).

So, you can't say that the terms of the license agreement modify the sales
contract or prevent you from using something that is yours, because there is
no contract and it isn't yours.  Once you agree to the EULA it is yours, but
only under those conditions that you agreed to.  There is no modifying of
anything, and that is the rub.

Besides, even if you did want to pursue this, the best outcome you could
expect is:  You get your $200 back and they take your XBOX (which was
probably moded anyway), or if you really could pursue it to the extreme,
Microsoft stops selling the XBOX in your country.  Would you be happy in
either of those circumstances?

Unfortunately, like the last post says, the argument over allowing or not
allowing signed code to run on the Xbox is something we can all waste lots
of time with, and it would be really nice to do...  But the future holds
code updates as a regular part of a vendors obligation to the end user to
keep their product performing the function it was sold to do.  After all,
when they sold it to you they have entered into the contract with you to
make a product that works as advertised - and I'm sure you would hold them
to it. 


-----Original Message-----
From: Ansgar Wiechers [mailto:bugtraq@...netcobalt.net] 
Sent: Thursday, September 11, 2003 7:14 PM
To: Nicholas Weaver
Cc: Stefan Esser; full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com;
bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft


On 2003-09-11 Nicholas Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 08:30:39PM +0200, Stefan Esser composed:
>> well it finally happened. I came back home after work, connected my 
>> XBOX to the internet and went into the XBOX-Live menu configuration. 
>> Well what happened. The XBOX started automaticly downloading the new 
>> crappy XBOX-Live dashboard, which is of course fixed.
>> 
>> This is IMHO an act of computer sabotage. I have never allowed MS to 
>> modify my dashboard or to auto update my dashboard.
>> 
>> Is any lawyer on the list who can point me to the right paragraphs? I 
>> do not believe this computer sabotage is legal in any european 
>> country.
> 
> Read the End User Liscence Agreement that you agreed to with the X-box 
> (its probably somewhere in the box).
> 
> Dollars-to-doughnuts says that Microsoft maintains the right to 
> update/change the software regardless of your wishes.
> 
> All your Rights are belong to Bill (tm)

No, they don't. In Germany it is not legal to unilaterally modify a sales
contract that has already been agreed on (if the result of not agreeing
would be not being able to use the product). So EULAs are simply not
effective in almost every case.

Stefan, you might want to read into the AGBG [1] and consult a lawyer, but
(IANAL) I'm not sure how much of a chance this would have in courts.

[1] http://dejure.org/gesetze/AGBG

Regards
Ansgar Wiechers


This message and any included attachments is intended for the sole use of
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. The information contained
herein is confidential, proprietary or privileged and may be subject to
protection under law. You are notified that unauthorized use, distribution,
review or reproduction of such information is strictly prohibited and may
subject you to criminal or civil penalties. If you have received this
transmission in error, please promptly delete it and notify the sender by
e-mail with a copy to 'postmaster@...dersonbrothers.com'.


_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ