[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1063778164.3168.18.camel@tantor.nuclearelephant.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 01:56:04 -0400
From: "Jonathan A. Zdziarski" <jonathan@...learelephant.com>
To: Thor Larholm <thor@...x.com>
Cc: list@...ield.org, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
NTBugtraq <NTBUGTRAQ@...TSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>,
full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND
releases new
There's a link to a great rant about this in an article I wrote up today
about Verisign's Anti-Competitive history at
http://www.nuclearelephant.com/papers/verisign.html. A few key points
the author of the rant hits on is that Verisign implemented this
virtually overnight with no input whatsoever from the operations
community. As a result, it broke a lot of things such as Anti-Spam
tools that reject mail from nonexistent domains, intercepts passwords
and other URL information misdirected to a nonexistent site or
unreachable sites, and sitefinder apparently has an open SMTP relay as
well.
In my own article, I had started to make mention about making both
practical and legal moves towards creating a non-profit organization to
manage a centralized top-level registry + a new set of root servers with
a _predefined set of rules_ all registry subscribers (domain registries)
must adhere to or risk being removed. As I read more about some of the
whacked-on-drugs things Verisign has done recently, I'm beginning to
think we need to move on something like this a lot quicker than we have
been.
The InterNIC wasn't perfect, but they certainly weren't commercialized
in the way Verisign is now. The Internet now being a commercial
enterprise, root servers and TLDs should by no means be in the hands of
a for-profit corporation.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists