bugtraq - Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0309170824260.9714@meatpuppet>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 08:25:12 -0700 (PDT)
From: Person <devon@...hiumnode.com>
To: Tobias Klein <tobias.klein@...tel.de>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, vulnwatch@...urityfocus.com,
   full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, vuln-dev@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Lun_mountd.c vs mounty.c


I can vouch for this - mounty.c is the original.

[d]

On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, Tobias Klein wrote:

> frew min ago i was browsing packetstorm and i cant belive my eyes
> anyone has changed a half haeder of my code and disclosures it to packetstorm
>
> i cant understand why pplz does that
> are they not able to got there own skills
> i have investigate many hours to write this code and it should never released
> but some sucker leaked it and some other gay changes the half haeder and
> disclosures it
>
> attached is the ORGINAL EXPLOIT code i wrote months ago
>
> newroot

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html