bugtraq - Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0309242118540.6869-100000@gandalf.hugo.vanderkooij.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 21:26:14 +0200 (CEST)
From: Hugo van der Kooij <hvdkooij@...derkooij.org>
To: "BUGTRAQ@...URITYFOCUS. COM" <BUGTRAQ@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Privacy leak in VeriSign's SiteFinder service #2

On Wed, 24 Sep 2003, Mark Coleman wrote:

> More naughty Verisign deeds...

....

> This means that they can easily harvest the SOURCE email address field 
> for marketing purposes (no typos there), and would have a strong 
> educated guess of the correct domain of the mistyped TARGET.

Unfortunatly I found paper mail getting to me with an address that was 
only used by a Veri$ign company and the address in this format was not 
available through the WHOIS records. They sold my data without my consent.

That was the moment I decided to go to another register with my domain 
info. So I think ill intend is not just suspected but must be considered 
to be a real fact of life with Veri$ign

I for one have removed the Veri$ign root certificates and will inform
sites relying on them about the risk they take with Veri$ign and do advise 
others to take smilar actions so we hurt them through their wallet.

Hugo.

-- 
 All email sent to me is bound to the rules described on my homepage.
    hvdkooij@...derkooij.org		http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
	    Don't meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
	    for they are subtle and quick to anger.