bugtraq - RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8B32EDC90D8F4E4AB40918883281874D0BAF6D@pivxwin2k1.secnet.pivx.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 14:50:52 -0800
From: "Thor Larholm" <thor@...x.com>
To: "white colin john" <cjwhite1@...nx13.ews.uiuc.edu>
Cc: "Liu Die Yu" <liudieyuinchina@...oo.com.cn>,
	<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack

> From: white colin john [mailto:cjwhite1@...nx13.ews.uiuc.edu] 
> If there's no proof-of-concept that shows current 
> bugs can be combined into an exploit, is there 
> any pressure on microsoft to patch the bugs?

There has already been several proof-of-concepts for each and every
vulnerability that was used to produce this exploit, and Microsoft are
patching those vulnerabilities. We already know and have demonstrated
that they can be abused, this exploit is just a refinement of those
POC's to ease exploitation - hence my concern.

Regards
Thor Larholm
Senior Security Researcher
PivX Solutions, LLC
Get our research, join our mailinglist - http://pivx.com/larholm/