lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0311051642230.13048-100000@ehlnx13.ews.uiuc.edu> Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2003 16:43:37 -0600 (CST) From: white colin john <cjwhite1@...nx13.ews.uiuc.edu> To: Thor Larholm <thor@...x.com> Cc: Liu Die Yu <liudieyuinchina@...oo.com.cn>, <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com> Subject: RE: Six Step IE Remote Compromise Cache Attack On Wed, 5 Nov 2003, Thor Larholm wrote: > This post raises an interesting question. Is our goal to find new > vulnerabilities and attack vectors to help secure users and critical > infrastructures, or is our goal to ease exploitation of existing > vulnerabilities? If there's no proof-of-concept that shows current bugs can be combined into an exploit, is there any pressure on microsoft to patch the bugs?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists