bugtraq - Re: Vulnerability Disclosure Formats (was "Re: Funny article")

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3FBA5BFD.40703@germinus.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 18:50:53 +0100
From: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino <jfernandez@...minus.com>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Vulnerability Disclosure Formats (was "Re: Funny article")


Steven M. Christey wrote:

> There are a couple proposals out there, but I don't think they've
> gotten as much attention as they deserve:
>
> Common Advisory Interchange Format
> 
http://cert.uni-stuttgart.de/files/caif/requirements/split/requirements.html
>
>
> Advisory and Notification Markup Language (ANML)
> http://www.opensec.org/anml/
>

I would also add to the list the

EISPP Common Advisory Format Description”, (EISPP-D3-001-TR), version
1.2, 28 march 2003  http://www.eispp.org/commonformat.pdf

Even if this one is slightly biased towards CERTs it could be used by
vendors too.

Regards

Javier Fernandez-Sanguino