lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20031127214523.GY59713@snowcrash.tpb.net> Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 22:45:24 +0100 From: Niels Bakker <niels-bugtraq@...ker.net> To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Subject: Re: Unhackable network really unhackable? * bugjules@...rkey.org (Julian Wynne) [Thu 27 Nov 2003, 19:14 CET]: [..] > Furthermore we would like to point out that InvisiLAN technology has no > relation whatsoever with DHCP, for example InvisiLAN changes randomly > not just the IP address but also the MAC address and the port numbers. That rules out long-living TCP sessions. Kind of defeats the purpose of having a machine connected, doesn't it? -- Niels. -- [Please reply to niels=bugtraq@...ker.net instead. I'm sick and tired of all the morons who misconfigure their mailers and send autoreplies back after anybody contributes something to a mailing list.]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists