bugtraq - RE: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6.0.1.1.2.20040124115342.0277bfe8@imap.anastrophe.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004 11:55:31 -0800
From: bugtraq@...strophe.com
To: "'BUGTRAQ@...URITYFOCUS. COM'" <BUGTRAQ@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate

At 01:45 PM 1/23/2004, B. Kinney wrote:
>I don't disagree with your opinion on the article - it was meant to be
>shock journalism.  It's the only way they can get us to read anything
>about our political system.
>
>I still am of the nature that you don't go places you don't belong.  If
>you need a more concrete example, think about the ladie's room.  How old
>were you when you learned which door is NOT yours?
>
>Do you ever enter the wrong one with the intent of seeing something?!
>If you did, don't you think your friends and coworkers would find it
>inappropriate and disgraceful?

that wasn't the point of the followup. the point of the followup was that 
the original poster elided critical information in order to slant the 
message of the article to his particular political bias.

which is just as lame and dishonest as what the republicans did.

Paul Theodoropoulos
http://www.anastrophe.com