[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0402031405010.254-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 14:06:58 -0600 (CST)
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne@...ternet.com>
To: Christian Vogel <chris@...lix.hedonism.cx>
Cc: Mariusz Woloszyn <emsi@...rtners.pl>, <Daniel.Capo@....net.br>,
<computerguy@....rr.com>, <BUGTRAQ@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Major hack attack on the U.S. Senate
[SNIP]
>
> i think "technical" people often think of the law-system as something
> as C-code, as it's written there is only one way for a standard
> compliant compiler to interpret it. I think the judges are more flexible
> than gcc in this regard, they can also assume that one perfectly knows
> that one is supposed to read http://www.cnn.com but not to read
> http://qz25srv.competitor.com/internal/memos/strategy.doc (made up
> example) even if -- from a technical standpoint -- there is no
> difference.
>
> They will most likely assume that it was very negligent for the
> competitor to leave his business plan in the open and value this in
> their decision, but nevertheless you should have known better than to
> state "I thought it was meant to be published".
>
> And yes, I'm normally also in favour of the technical viewpoint... :-)
>
>
And of course all know that banners implicitly stating access policies can
help support the legal standing when there may be doubts.
Thanks,
Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists