bugtraq - Re: Decompression Bombs [...missed something]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040206175544.17039.qmail@www.securityfocus.com>
Date: 6 Feb 2004 17:55:44 -0000
From: Bipin Gautam. <door_hunt3r@...ckcodemail.com>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Decompression Bombs [...missed something]

In-Reply-To: <401FD489.8070602@...asec.de>

isn't the concept same as the one I produced 3 months ago in...
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/8572/info/

indeed the replica... of my old concept!

[... fine, A new class of bug! & in the wild AGAIN ]

>As a followup to http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/9393/, where we 
>pointed out vulnerabilities of some antivirus-gateways while 
>decompressing bzip2-bombs, we were interested in the behaviour of 
>various applications that process compressed data.
>
>>We've created several bombs (bzip2, gzip, zip, mime-embedded bombs, png 
>and gif graphics, openoffice zip bombs). With these we tested some more 
>applications like additional antivirus engines, various web browsers, 
>openoffice.org, and the Gimp.
>
>As a result, much more applications as we thought crashed. The 
>manufacturers of software should care more about the processing of 
>untrusted input.
>
>For details see our full advisory, written by Dr. Peter Bieringer: 
>http://www.aerasec.de/security/advisories/decompression-bomb-vulnerability.html