bugtraq - Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <40280618.9090401@tweakt.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 17:13:44 -0500
From: Mark Renouf <mark@...akt.net>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: clamav 0.65 remote DOS exploit

Oliver Eikemeier wrote:

> 0.65 ist the latest stable (release) version, so I guess most production 
> servers would
> run it, instead of an CVS snapshot.

Are earlier versions than 0.65 affected?

Gentoo's portage tree has 0.60 as latest stable, and 0.65 is in testing 
(~x86.. masked, but available). Nothing in CVS is allowed into portage.