bugtraq - Re: Another Low Blow From Microsoft: MBSA Failure!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Law11-OE65ZsJIDhvVv0003c24e@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:14:08 -0800
From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity@...mail.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>, <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
   <patchmanagement@...tserv.patchmanagement.org>, <dotsecure@...hmail.com>
Subject: Re: Another Low Blow From Microsoft: MBSA Failure!

> been applied. We have scanned with Retina, Foundstone and Qualys tools
> which they all showed as "VULNERABLE", however when we scanned with Microsoft
> Base Security Analyzer it showed as "NOT VULNERABLE". This was at first
> confusing; one would think an assessment tool released by the original

did you try exploit code to verify? that should dispel any ambiguity
across scanner reports, it would be real easy to load your network
hosts into a batch file or shell script and see how many "roots" you get.

just a thought... eliminates alot of guesswork.. ( imo )

m.wood
http://exploitlabs.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html