bugtraq - Re: Another Low Blow From Microsoft: MBSA Failure!

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 11:58:10 -0500
From: "Kenneth R. van Wyk" <Ken@...W.com>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
   patchmanagement@...tserv.patchmanagement.org
Subject: Re: Another Low Blow From Microsoft: MBSA Failure!

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:

>Remember - if the exploit works, you have a problem.  Failure of the
>exploit to work does NOT mean you don't have a problem - somebody with
>a different version that has a critical offset set to 4 more or less
>may make swiss cheese of your network.
>  
>
Yes, excellent point.  Phrased somewhat differently, software testing 
only detects the presence
of a problem, not the absence of one.  I believe that that subtle but 
oh-so-important point is
not understood far too often.

Cheers,

Ken van Wyk
-- 
KRvW Associates, LLC
CERT® Certified Computer Security Incident Handler
http://www.KRvW.com

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html