bugtraq - Re: Update - CheckPoint Vulnerabilities

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0c0f01c3f157$2f74ac10$e932a8c0@Phoenix>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:58:44 -0000
From: "Mark Litchfield" <mark@...software.com>
To: "Nicob" <nicob@...ob.net>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: Re: Update - CheckPoint Vulnerabilities


I am not, nor is NGS a partner of Checkpoint, so we were not privy to the
'partners security' bulletin..  I would be interested however in seeing the
full posting by Checkpoint.

Mark

----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicob" <nicob@...ob.net>
To: "Mark Litchfield" <mark@...software.com>
Cc: <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:48 AM
Subject: Re: Update - CheckPoint Vulnerabilities


> On Wed, 2004-02-11 at 19:51, Mark Litchfield wrote:
> > Whilst examining what was going on in the world of security, I came
across
> > an update by Checkpoint in regards to some recently reported
vulnerabilities
> > in their products, specifically CheckPoint FW-1 and CheckPoint VPN-1.
> >
> > For more info - http://www.checkpoint.com/corporate/iss.html
>
> In the Security Bulletin sent to their partners, Checkpoint had some
> strong words against the way ISS released these advisories :
>
>
> ISS' negligence, combined with a
> blatant attempt to market their
> products resulted in the public
> release of the following inaccurate
> statements [...]
>
>
> --
> Nicob <nicob@...ob.net>
>
>
>