bugtraq - Re: W2K source "leaked"?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0402121939330.19616@kungfunix.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:42:01 -0500 (EST)
From: sil <jesus@...urrected.us>
To: Gadi Evron <ge@...tistical.reprehensible.net>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com,
   Thor Larholm <thor@...x.com>
Subject: Re: W2K source "leaked"?

This is the CNET article going up.

http://news.com.com/2100-7349_3-5158496.html

Again, I don't know/care if this is true of MS' source code being posted,
and I too smell something fishy in the air with this whole 'story' coming
out. Considering there is supposedly 600mb's or so of alleged code, but
unless MS says something, I wouldn't know what to think of it.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2004, Gadi Evron wrote:

>
> Can anyone confirm this is the real source code? How about a press
> release? :)
>
> 	Gadi Evron
>
>

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
"The most tyrannical of governments are those which make
crimes of  opinions, for everyone has an inalienable
right to his thoughts." -- Benedict Spinoza

//sil

http://www.kungfunix.net   http://www.politrix.org
http://www.infiltrated.net http://bush.shafted.us

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html