bugtraq - Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200403300126.i2U1QuHR006301@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 20:26:56 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Drew Copley <dcopley@...e.com>
Cc: Jelmer <jkuperus@...net.nl>, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com,
   bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 17:14:12 PST, Drew Copley said:
>  

> > Has anybody offered the Microsoft dude who denied the 
> > existence of 0-days
> > some ketchup for his fried crow? ;)
> 
> I do not recall this quote. Such a quote would be patently untrue even
> from the viewpoint of legitimate researchers that have open bugs with
> them. Such bugs are "zero day", though the vendor may be aware of them. 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3485972.stm

Sad part was that the CTO for their security business and technology unit.

And yes, he was widely derided for it.

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped