bugtraq - Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200403300052.i2U0qgF0005124@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:52:42 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: Drew Copley <dcopley@...e.com>
Cc: Jelmer <jkuperus@...net.nl>, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com,
   bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:44:12 PST, Drew Copley <dcopley@...e.com>  said:

> Yeah. It is a zero day worm, and it is very notable as such.  
> 
> I can not recall a previous zero day worm. (AV is not my job, but I do
> try and follow zero day.)
> 
> Hence, IE has birthed us the first zero day worm.

Has anybody offered the Microsoft dude who denied the existence of 0-days
some ketchup for his fried crow? ;)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped