[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404091153260.11871-100000@maequeses.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 11:58:24 -0400 (EDT)
From: Chris Johnson <johnson@....mgh.harvard.edu>
To: Geoffrey <esoteric@...mes25.net>
Cc: K-OTiK Security <Special-Alerts@...tik.com>,
<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>,
Chris Johnson <johnson@....mgh.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Full-Disclosure is now ILLEGAL in France ! (Vulnerabilties,
Technical details, Exploits ...)
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Geoffrey wrote:
> Chris Johnson wrote:
>
> > This is and always has been in the Napoleonic Code if I remember
> > correctly from my school days.
>
> Then you don't want to do business in Louisiana, USA either then. The
> laws there are based on the Napoleonic code as well. One reason they
> have parishes rather than counties..
>
> --
> Until later, Geoffrey Registered Linux User #108567
> Building secure systems in spite of Microsoft
>
I should have been more explicit. The assumption of guilt
before innocense is a part of French law and has been since Napoleonic
times I believe. You'll find that Napoleonic law and that which is
derived from it (including Louisiana law) is a very different creature
than that which is derived from English Common Law. The wording of
the French law doesn't surprise me at all.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Johnson |Internet: johnson@....mgh.harvard.edu
Systems Administrator |Web: http://www.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/~johnson
NMR Center |Voice: 617.726.0949
Mass. General Hospital |FAX: 617.726.7422
149 (2301) 13th Street |If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more
Charlestown, MA., 02129 USA |happy people? Tea bag tag
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Powered by blists - more mailing lists