[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2DF52978DE0D854F9435C7AA7DD51F9801F4A12D@atlmaiexcp01.iss.local>
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 13:33:53 -0400
From: "Brito, Nelson (ISS Brazil)" <NBrito@....net>
To: "T.H. Haymore" <bonk@...chat.chatsystems.com>,
<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: After Ms patches last Wed ...
(As usual, and obviously: not speaking on behalf of my employer.)
I didn't see anything unusual, neither with my Win2k nor with my WinXP boxes.
It'd be a machine specific or something conflicts with some DLL(s).
It is usual to replace some DLL(s) when install some program(s).
Cheers.
Nelson Brito
> -----Original Message-----
> From: T.H. Haymore [mailto:bonk@...chat.chatsystems.com]
> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2004 5:29 AM
> To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
> Subject: Re: After Ms patches last Wed ...
>
>
> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, phaser-X wrote:
>
> > I had a different issue after Wednesdays updates. Two
> win2k computers in
> > my office were rendered useless after the patch. They were
> fine before,
> > but as soon as the patch finished and the PC was rebooted,
> the CPU usage
> > was 100% and nothing could be done. I left both PC's
> sitting for about 20
> > minutes and the 100% CPU usage never came down. Another
> coworker said he
> > had the same issue with his home PC and he was eventually
> able to get into
> > the task manager and noticed that the system process was
> taking up 99-100%
> > of the CPU.
>
>
> I have run into the same thing with 2K workstations as well
> as 2K server.
> On a side note, an XP 'goof off' box I use will no longer
> connect to the
> online card games or anything else. (Thank goodness for BSD).
>
>
> >
> > Anyone else experience this issue?
> >
> > -pX
>
>
>
>
> =================================================
> Travis
> www.cyberabuse.org/crimewatch
> Email: Bonk@...tsystems.com | Bonk@...erabuse.org
> =================================================
> /"\
> \ /
> X ASCII Ribbon Campaign
> / \ Against HTML Email
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists