bugtraq - RE: After Ms patches last Wed ...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:44:26 -0700 (PDT)
From: phaser-X <px@...oday.net>
To: Alun Jones <alun@...is.com>
Cc: aborg@....org.mt, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: RE: After Ms patches last Wed ...

I couldn't do anything on the system.  If I hit CTRL+ALT+DEL to get into 
the task manager, it literally took about 20 minutes.  Everything was very 
unresponsive.  I ended up having to use the "repair" feature off the win2k 
CD.  It replaced a few files and then the system was fine until I went 
back and re-updated, then the PC crashed after about 15 minutes and upon 
reboot the system was 100% again.  I repeated the "repair" option to get 
everything back to normal again.  And yes, it was the "system" process 
that was 99-100%, not the system idle process.

-pX

On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, Alun Jones wrote:

> phaser-X wrote:
> > I had a different issue after Wednesdays updates.  Two win2k
> > computers in my office were rendered useless after the patch.
> >  They were fine before, but as soon as the patch finished and
> > the PC was rebooted, the CPU usage was 100% and nothing could
> > be done.  I left both PC's sitting for about 20 minutes and
> > the 100% CPU usage never came down.  Another coworker said he
> > had the same issue with his home PC and he was eventually
> > able to get into the task manager and noticed that the system
> > process was taking up 99-100% of the CPU.
> 
> Not that it's necessarily the case for you, but frequently patching is the
> one time when reboots are almost bound to occur - as a result, an awful lot
> of bugs are discovered after the patch, but not necessarily because of the
> patch.  General advice is to try uninstalling the patch and see if the
> problem still exists, before deciding which way to debug - not very easy if
> you have all your CPU locked up!
> 
> As to the "system process" taking up 99-100% of the CPU, there is a "System
> Idle Process" that is _supposed_ to do that.  I hope your coworker hasn't
> misconstrued :-)
> 
> Try calling PSS (you know, tech support?), and see if they have any ideas.
> 
> Alun.
> ~~~~
> -- 
> Texas Imperial Software   | Find us at http://www.wftpd.com or email
> 1602 Harvest Moon Place   | alun@...is.com.
> Cedar Park TX 78613-1419  | WFTPD, WFTPD Pro are Windows FTP servers.
> Fax/Voice +1(512)258-9858 | Try our NEW client software, WFTPD Explorer.
> 
>