bugtraq - [VulnDiscuss] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: RS-2004-1: SquirrelMail "Content-Type" XSS vulnerability

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <vejsb0l54bdad7htjk0bck42nj51ailokk@4ax.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 00:10:05 +0200
From: Roman Medina <roman@...labs.com>
To: Matt Zimmerman <mdz@...ian.org>
Cc: Lupe Christoph <lupe@...e-christoph.de>,
	full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com,
	vulnwatch@...nwatch.org, security@...ian.org
Subject: [VulnDiscuss] Re: [Full-Disclosure] Re: RS-2004-1: SquirrelMail "Content-Type" XSS vulnerability


On Tue, 1 Jun 2004 16:59:42 -0700, you wrote:

>On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 01:49:01AM +0200, Roman Medina wrote:
>
>> In other words, many vendors/developers silently fixes bugs and they don't
>> necesarily have to know who is packaging their software and inform them.
>
>this way.  There is no need to contact every downstream vendor directly;
>they monitor the usual channels.

----
#ifdef _security_perspective_
#define usual_channels bugtraq other_lists
#endif

#ifdef _devel_perspective_
#define usual_channels changelog_file
#endif

printf("My usual channels are: %s", usual_channels);
----

It was some kind of pseudocode :-) Question: which perspective are
using Debian maintainers to monitorize their packages? In the
particular case of SM, the old XSS issues were listed in ChangeLog,
but .deb package was not updated. Why?

 Saludos,
 --Roman

--
PGP Fingerprint:
09BB EFCD 21ED 4E79 25FB  29E1 E47F 8A7D EAD5 6742
[Key ID: 0xEAD56742. Available at KeyServ]