[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A16F9DC0E61ACF43AF708AC2D3BE2B060412A3@gracey.internal.compucounts.com>
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 22:06:01 -0400
From: "Chris Carlson" <chris@...pucounts.com>
To: "Jelmer" <jkuperus@...net.nl>
Cc: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>, <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>
Subject: RE: Internet explorer 6 execution of arbitrary code (An analysis of the 180 Solutions Trojan)
When run remotely:
Line: 1
Char: 1
Error: Access is denied.
Code: 0
URL: http://62.131.86.111/security/idiots/repro/installer.htm
When run locally, software installation is blocked.
Using IE 6.0.2900.2096 SP2, WinXP SP2
I've gotta say that SP2 has some VERY nice protection builtin. On the downside, I still havn't figured out how to turn it off ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Jelmer
> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 21:22
> To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com; peter@...lomatmail.net
> Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Internet explorer 6 execution of
> arbitrary code (An analysis of the 180 Solutions Trojan)
>
> Just when I though it was save to once more use internet
> explorer I received an email bringing my attention to this
> webpage http://216.130.188.219/ei2/installer.htm that
> according to him used an exploit that affected fully patched
> internet explorer 6 browsers. Being rather skeptical I
> carelessly clicked on the link only to witness how it
> automatically installed addware on my pc!!!
>
> Now there had been reports about 0day exploits making rounds
> for quite some time like for instance this post
>
> http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/363338/2004-05-11/2004-05-17/0
>
> However I hadn't seen any evidence to support this up until
> now Thor Larholm as usual added to the confusion by
> deliberately spreading disinformation as seen in this post
>
> http://seclists.org/lists/bugtraq/2004/May/0153.html
>
> Attributing it to and I quote "just one of the remaining IE
> vulnerabilities that are not yet patched"
>
> I've attempted to write up an analysis that will show that
> there are at least 2 new and AFAIK unpublished
> vulnerabilities (feel free to proof me
> wrong) out there in the wild, one being fairly sophisticated
>
> You can view it at:
>
> http://62.131.86.111/analysis.htm
>
> Additionally you can view a harmless demonstration of the
> vulnerabilities at
>
> http://62.131.86.111/security/idiots/repro/installer.htm
>
> Finally I also attached the source files to this message
>
>
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists