[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33L2.0407080722190.14539-100000@bigiron.atistar.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 07:28:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nigel Stepp <stepp@...star.net>
To: <rsh@...rect.com>
Cc: dave <dave@...unitysec.com>, OIS <announcements@...afety.org>,
<bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>, <NTBUGTRAQ@...TSERV.NTBUGTRAQ.COM>,
<full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Subject: Re: Public Review of OIS Security Vulnerability
Reporting and Response Guidelines
On Tue, 6 Jul 2004 rsh@...rect.com wrote:
> To add to the 'Nobody trusts the OIS or its motives', I have to state
> that those NOT in the US object strenuously to anyone in the US
> unilaterally legislating anything that impacts a system used
> world-wide, when the 'safety' being legislated is to the benefit of
> the US over the rest of the world's concerns. US court rulings in
> the area of the Internet, copyright, email privacy, and individual
> privacy rights tend to go against the views and rulings in the rest
> of the world, making us leery of any US centric legislation, much
> less unilateral laws on 'Internet Safety' or security.
I have to add that many IN the US feel the same way.
> R.S. (Bob) Heuman - Toronto, ON, Canada
> =======================================================
> Independent Computer Security Consulting
> Web Site Auditing for Compliance with Standards
> <rsh@...rect.com> or <rheuman@...ers.com>
> Copyright retained.
> My opinions - no one else's...
> If this is illegal where you are, do not read it!
>
--
:wq
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists