bugtraq - Re: [ GLSA 200408-10 ] gv: Exploitable Buffer Overflow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <411E52F6.6070505@gentoo.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 13:59:18 -0400
From: Dan Margolis <krispykringle@...too.org>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com,
   security-alerts@...uxsecurity.com
Subject: Re: [ GLSA 200408-10 ] gv: Exploitable Buffer Overflow

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

There seems to be some confusion regarding our recent gv buffer overflow
GLSA. This GLSA came on the heels of the following fake advisory, which
also reported a buffer overflow in gv[1]. That advisory contained
alleged exploit code that, in fact, contained a local DoS exploit.

The gv vulnerability reported and patched in GLSA 200408-10 is not the
same as this fictitious vulnerability. The vulnerability patched is the
same referred to in the CVE reference[2] included in the GLSA, a real
two-year old vulnerability in gv.

Please do not run the alleged exploit code listed in the fictigious gv
advisory, as it is a local DoS exploit. However, all information
contained in the GLSA is correct, and all Gentoo users should still
upgrade their gv installations to the latest available version.

This e-mail is merely meant to clarify some confusion that may have
resulted from bad information in the relevant Gentoo bug[3] and comments
on various security mailing lists. The information contained within the
GLSA is still valid, and therefore no official errata will be issued.

For more information on Gentoo security policies, please see Gentoo's
Vulnerability Policy[4].

[1] http://www.osvdb.org/displayvuln.php?osvdb_id=8399
[2] http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2002-0838
[3] http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59385
[4] http://www.gentoo.org/security/en/vulnerability-policy.xml
- --
Dan Margolis ("KrispyKringle")
Gentoo Linux Security Coordinator
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)

iQEVAwUBQR5S9rDO2aFJ9pv2AQLl8wgAjoCOX80DmivzloyqB8XkwxD5R2LPqFRN
+2YK5hlMTi9PJNN/cC78Pvdm4vwH/M1HQJOWf4A9BoC0ERegcqANi/AqHJgw5CPu
0ZF3IjNqGwmBM7TRcuQErwpXWFiiOTHaev/AfAnkTWjhJuVLTgVJFz/f91kObY3r
ys8OugVhvpNUAgL6Sw4EmOAm8KR4bDYqLhmEkGowIbwMU9oG0HwwrXM9iXWokmcz
A/xrvCAbYWh1UVvwxdz7x5t4idW6c5qMgf4Oou/KmvjLRV0kf2gzp0GB8sFmjvUS
h38Pg5Fx2se38RxaU8tJKmWv9ze7aknnzTx1avq/QAvdmwpNsV7vxw==
=xDpJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html