lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040911204710.4aa7abed.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:47:10 -0700
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
To: "Wolfpaw - Dale Corse" <admin@...fpaw.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, grsecurity@...ecurity.net,
	bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.27 SECURITY BUG - TCP Local (probable Remote) Denial
 of Service


On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:45:43 -0600
"Wolfpaw - Dale Corse" <admin@...fpaw.net> wrote:

> As for it being an application bug - it may be one in Mysql not
> closing the sockets, but it is a Kernel Bug that allows CLOSE_WAIT
> sockets to clog up the connection queues, and cause a DOS conditions
> on other applications (such as Apache). Since most software used for
> denial of service is badly written (intentionally) to exploit the
> holes, the error should be fixed, not blamed on faulty software.

If the application doesn't close it's file descriptors there is
absolutely nothing the kernel can do about it.

It's a resource leak, plain and simple.

> That being said - below is a the proper description, and the code
> used to exploit it. Hope it helps. This version is not the one
> which invokes the CLOSE_WAIT state, but rather the TIME_WAIT one,
> I am not able to publish the source code for the CLOSE_WAIT bug.

There is nothing wrong with creating tons of TIME_WAIT sockets,
they simply time out after 60 seconds (unless hit by a RESET
packet or similar).  This is how TCP works.

> The log however clearly shows that a mysql descriptor is closed, 
> and then used immediately again by the socket call, which causes it 
> never to end up getting closed. Linux apparently has either no 
> timeout for CLOSE_WAIT, or it's a very very long one.. Either way 
> is a bad thing.

Please do us all a favor and learn how TCP works.

CLOSE_WAIT means simply that only one side of the TCP
connection has done a close.  Therefore the other end
stays open until that side closes as well.

There is no way to "time things out" or release the
state.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ