[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1095173133.6806.24.camel@Gibson>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2004 15:45:34 +0100
From: Barrie Dempster <barrie@...oot-robot.net>
To: Stefan.Laudat@...ianztiriac.ro
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: Re: The ArpSucker is b0rn! Be yourself, be
the net.
Obviously the moderator though it was appropriate, however, you did
reply to more than bugtraq and at least one non-moderated list. Please
be more careful where you direct your insults.
The guy released a tool he though was useful, if you don't think it is,
a more polite response with some background as to your opinion would
have been more well received.
Calling someone a "lame kiddie" whether it is true or not, doesn't serve
any real purpose, and should also be removed from moderated lists. I
would have much preferred to read your opinion on it backed up by some
example or evidence, rather than a flame of someone who is in my opinion
actually hacking and freely passing on his findings.
Alpt, I for one hope you continue along any research path you see fit,
ignoring flames for the useless noise they are.
On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 08:23, Stefan.Laudat@...ianztiriac.ro wrote:
> Usually lame kiddie posts like this shouldn't reach the list. Old school
> ARP attacks are no longer a threat in a decently managed layer 2
> network. I thought bugtraq is still moderated. Oh, Aleph1, where art thee
> ?
>
> ---
> Stefan Laudat
> Networking & IT Security Manager
> Allianz Tiriac SA Insurance
--
Barrie Dempster (zeedo) - Fortiter et Strenue
http://www.bsrf.org.uk
[ gpg --recv-keys --keyserver www.keyserver.net 0x96025FD0 ]
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists