bugtraq - Re: Vulnerability in IBM Windows XP: default hidden Administrator account allows local Administrator access

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20040918184230.GA15407@eiv.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:42:30 -0400
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon@....com>
To: Michael Scheidell <scheidell@...nap.net>
Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com, vulnwatch@...nwatch.org,
   full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, vuln@...urity-corporation.com
Subject: Re: Vulnerability in IBM Windows XP: default hidden Administrator account allows local Administrator access

On Sat, Sep 18, 2004 at 11:39:56AM -0400, Michael Scheidell said:
> XP HOME??? I am not talking about XP home.

You said you had never seen "a Windows install" where the Administrator
account didn't show.  I told you about a very common Windows install
where that is true.

A more appropriate response when someone expands your knowledge would be
"thank you".  Another good one would be "huh, didn't know that" or "you
learn something new every day."

No response at all would be acceptable, and more in keeping with
commonly-agreed standards of mailing list ettiquette.

Unless you are contending that Windows XP Home isn't Windows.

-- 
Shawn McMahon      | Let's set the record straight. There is no argument
EIV Consulting     | over the choice between peace and war, but there is
UNIX and Linux	   | only one guaranteed way you can have peace - and you
http://www.eiv.com | can have it in the next second - surrender. - Reagan

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped