bugtraq - Re: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <21C803509479EED5D91515E6@utd49554.utdallas.edu>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:53:59 -0600
From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu>
To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: Bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked


--On Thursday, November 11, 2004 02:22:18 PM -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu 
wrote:
>
> At least some of the machines used had active wireless on them

Do you know this for a fact?  Can you identify the states/locations where 
this was implemented?
>
> And how, pray tell, do you get "paranoid enough to watch access" to mean
> *anything* when we allow the hacker *physical* *access* *AND* be
> unsupervised due to the design of the polling booth?
>
What does physical access to the polling booth gain a "hacker"?  They would 
need physical access to the tabulator that counts the individual votes, 
would they not?

You're going to have to get more specific about what it is you think was 
possible.

Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu)
Adjunct Information Security Officer
The University of Texas at Dallas
AVIEN Founding Member
http://www.utdallas.edu

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html