lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <21C803509479EED5D91515E6@utd49554.utdallas.edu> Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 11:53:59 -0600 From: Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu> To: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu Cc: Bugtraq <bugtraq@...urityfocus.com>, full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Subject: Re: Re: Evidence Mounts that the Vote Was Hacked --On Thursday, November 11, 2004 02:22:18 PM -0500 Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote: > > At least some of the machines used had active wireless on them Do you know this for a fact? Can you identify the states/locations where this was implemented? > > And how, pray tell, do you get "paranoid enough to watch access" to mean > *anything* when we allow the hacker *physical* *access* *AND* be > unsupervised due to the design of the polling booth? > What does physical access to the polling booth gain a "hacker"? They would need physical access to the tabulator that counts the individual votes, would they not? You're going to have to get more specific about what it is you think was possible. Paul Schmehl (pauls@...allas.edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists