bugtraq - Re: Airport x-ray software creating images of phantom weapons?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20041116192539.GD13940@mail>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 14:25:39 -0500
From: David Maxwell <david@...f.net>
To: Jason Coombs <jasonc@...ence.org>
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com, bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: Airport x-ray software creating images of phantom weapons?

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Jason Coombs wrote:
> Software glitch in security scanner at Miami airport 'projected the image of a weapon' that didn't exist
> http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/news/nat_world/111304_APnat_airport.html
> 
> Why are we replacing perfectly good analog video displays with computer-generated displays for security-related data??
> 
> Haven't enough people learned yet that whenever you digitize something you render it unreal and vulnerable?
> 
> Stupid, stupid, stupid.

The purpose is to test that the operators are catching the images.

Reports are generated at month end on how many false-positives were
discovered.

The problem in this case, is that the operator must not have been
trained to handle the situation properly, since they could have quickly
determined that it was an intentional false-positive, instead of a real
threat.

-- 
David Maxwell, david@....net|david@...well.net --> The only difference I see
between voodoo and marketing research is that voodoo sometimes works! 
						- Leonard Stern 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html