bugtraq - Re: SLMail 5.x POP3 Remote Pass Buffer Overflow Exploit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: 21 Nov 2004 02:44:29 -0000
From: Jerome ATHIAS <jerome@...ias.fr>
To: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com
Subject: Re: SLMail 5.x POP3 Remote Pass Buffer Overflow Exploit


In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0411201323040.11076@...ced.attrition.org>

>On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, [iso-8859-1] J=E9r=F4me ATHIAS wrote:
>
>: SLMail 5.x POP3 Remote Pass Buffer Overflow Exploit
>:
>: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=3DCAN-2004-0942
>
>CAN-2004-0942 (under review)
>
>Description
>Apache webserver 2.0.52 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a
>denial of service (CPU consumption) via an HTTP GET request with a MIME
>header containing multiple lines with a large number of space characters.
>

Thanks to point our eyes on this mistake.
In fact there is an error here:
http://www.k-otik.com/exploits/20041118.SLmail-5.5-POP3-PASS.py.php
sure it'll be soon corrected ;p

>
>Perhaps you meant CAN-2003-0264:
>
>Multiple buffer overflows in SLMail 5.1.0.4420 allows remote attackers to
>execute arbitrary code via (1) a long EHLO argument to slmail.exe, (2) a
>long XTRN argument to slmail.exe, (3) a long string to POPPASSWD, or (4) a
>long password to the POP3 server.
>
>Or is this a new/different issue?
>
>

It is another one discovered recently my muts

regards,
Jerome