| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4b0fef7e04112111594932743d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 13:59:51 -0600 From: vord <vordhosbn@...il.com> To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com Cc: bugtraq@...urityfocus.com Subject: Re: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida Al Qaeda is to Iraq what electronic voting is to the bush election win. --vord On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 08:06:13 -0600, Stef <stefmit@...il.com> wrote: > On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:23:55 -0600, Paul Schmehl <pauls@...allas.edu> wrote: > > > I disagree. Until the research is credible and vetted, investigating is > > premature. Many people don't seem to understand, investigating supposed > > discrepancies in the vote costs millions of dollars. The recount in Ohio > > will cost the state $1.5 million. That's money that could pay for other > > things. So you don't run off on wild goose chases just because some > > "researcher" says, "Oooooo, look at this. This looks really unusual." > > Oh, yes, they/we do ... based on a comparison with another well known > "triplet": money spent <--> amount of credible information <--> > importance to the United States, when having invaded Iraq, I think we > could and should justify an investigation like the above ... > > Stef > > > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists